Capricious Classifications

Capricious Classifications is a legal doctrine within constitutional equal protection analysis that refers to arbitrary or irrational classificatory distinctions lacking a rational relationship to a legitimate state objective, thereby failing the minimal scrutiny standard under the Equal Protection Clause.

3

Publications

208

Citations

5

Authors

2

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

5

  1. SC
    Serge Cassen

    Nantes Université, France

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. DA
    Donald A. Gross

    University of Kentucky, United States

    1 publications · 111 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. GM
    Gerald M. Frumess

    1 publications · 79 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. CB
    Christine Boujot

    Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. LS
    Lee Sigelman

    George Washington University, United States

    1 publications · 111 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 5

Institutions

2

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

    Paris, France

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    18 citations

  2. Nantes Université

    Nantes, France

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    18 citations

1–2 of 2

Venues

  1. Comparative Politics

    1 publications · 111 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Archives of Dermatology

    1 publications · 79 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Antiquity

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

1–3