Bipolar Argumentation

Bipolar Argumentation is a formal argumentation framework that extends abstract argumentation by incorporating both attack and support relations between arguments, thereby enabling the representation and evaluation of inter-argumentative relationships characterized by opposition and reinforcement.

30

Publications

2.1K

Citations

59

Authors

34

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

16

Variants

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

Authors

59

  1. SW
    Stefan Woltran

    TU Wien, Austria

    4 publications · 391 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. ML
    Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex

    Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier, France

    4 publications · 284 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. LA
    Leïla Amgoud

    Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, France

    3 publications · 129 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. CC
    Claudette Cayrol

    Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier, France

    3 publications · 273 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. FT
    Francesca Toni

    Imperial College London, United Kingdom

    3 publications · 82 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5 of 59

Venues

  1. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

    4 publications · 276 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. International Journal of Intelligent Systems

    3 publications · 344 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Argument & Computation

    2 publications · 95 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

    Repository · 2 publications · 34 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Intelligenza Artificiale

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5