Argument From Precedent

Argument From Precedent is a form of analogical legal reasoning in which a legal conclusion is justified by reference to previously decided cases, distinguished by its reliance on judicial authority and doctrinal consistency within a common law system.

26

Publications

913

Citations

35

Authors

23

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Variants

Precedential Reasoning

Authors

35

  1. TB
    Trevor Bench‐Capon

    University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

    4 publications · 132 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. HP
    Henry Prakken

    Utrecht University, Netherlands

    3 publications · 104 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. DW
    Douglas Walton

    University of Windsor, Canada

    2 publications · 88 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. GS
    Giovanni Sartor

    University of Bologna, Italy

    2 publications · 43 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. FM
    Fabrizio Macagno

    Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal

    2 publications · 81 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 35

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 3 publications · 97 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. Argumentation and Advocacy

    2 publications · 40 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. The American Journal of Comparative Law

    2 publications · 105 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Philosophy and Rhetoric

    2 publications · 81 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

    1 publications · 45 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5