Annotation Scheme Comparison
Annotation Scheme Comparison is a methodological framework in contrastive corpus linguistics that systematically evaluates and contrasts the structural, functional, or interpretative features of different annotation schemes applied to comparable or parallel corpora to assess their compatibility, interoperability, or impact on linguistic analysis.
38
Publications
2.3K
Citations
134
Authors
58
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
14
38
Crowdsourcing the Annotation of Rumourous Conversations in Social Media
Arkaitz Zubiaga, Maria Liakata, Rob Procter et al. · 2015 · 68 citations
1–5 of 38
134
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 134
58

Saarland University
Saarbrücken, Germany
3 h-index
5 publications
117 citations
Charles University
Prague, Czechia
3 h-index
8 publications
834 citations
Center for Applied Linguistics
Washington D.C., United States
2 h-index
2 publications
52 citations

Tilburg University
Tilburg, The Netherlands
2 h-index
3 publications
1K citations
Columbia University
New York, United States
2 h-index
6 publications
102 citations
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
45 citations

Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, China
2 h-index
4 publications
58 citations

Masaryk University
Brno, Czechia
1 h-index
2 publications
34 citations
1–8 of 58
2 publications · 36 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 27 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 10 citations
1
h-index
Conference · 1 publications · 31 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 17 citations
1
h-index
1–5