Annotation Scheme Comparison

Annotation Scheme Comparison is a methodological framework in contrastive corpus linguistics that systematically evaluates and contrasts the structural, functional, or interpretative features of different annotation schemes applied to comparable or parallel corpora to assess their compatibility, interoperability, or impact on linguistic analysis.

38

Publications

2.3K

Citations

134

Authors

58

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

14

Authors

134

  1. HL
    Haitao Liu

    Zhejiang University, China

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. OR
    Owen Rambow

    Columbia University, United States

    2 publications · 34 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. JY
    Jianwei Yan

    Zhejiang University, China

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. FM
    Francis M. Tyers

    Indiana University, United States

    2 publications · 28 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. RJ
    Rebecca J. Passonneau

    Columbia University, United States

    2 publications · 34 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 134

Venues

  1. Language Resources and Evaluation

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Semantic Web

    1 publications · 27 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Computers and the Humanities

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Linguistic Annotation Workshop

    Conference · 1 publications · 31 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Studia Linguistica

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5