The role of video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: lung lobectomy by thoracoscopy versus the standard thoracotomy approach.

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness, safety, validity and benefits of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for performing pulmonary lobectomy in 24 patients with clinical NO stage I primary non-small-cell lung cancer compared with 30 patients who underwent a conventional thoracotomy. There were no significant differences in the intra-operative blood loss, duration of operation, or duration of chest tube drainage between the VATS group and the standard lobectomy group, but in this VATS' experience, patients had less postoperative pain. Numbers and distributions of dissected lymph-nodes were similar in patients whether undergoing standard thoracotomy or VATS lobectomy. We can confirm that the safety and validity of VATS are virtually identical to those of the standard thoracotomy approach in the lobectomy. However, the former technique causes less discomfort to patients and requires a shorter recovery period of laboratory data and IL-6 concentrations in thoracic drainage fluid. We conclude that VATS major lung resection is technically feasible. Stringent patient selection is important and special training is needed.