PubMed · 2015 · 50 citations · 33 references
MedicineBiostatisticsOncologyCancer EpidemiologyEpidemiologyMeta-analysisAlcohol Use EpidemiologyCancer RiskColorectal CancerAlcohol Consumption PatternsAlcohol-related Cancer RiskCancer Risk AssessmentCase-control Association StudiesColorectal Cancer EpidemiologyDose ResponsePubmed SearchRelative Risk Estimation
OBJECT: In order to provide an updated quantification of the association between alcohol intake and colorectal cancer, we conducted a meta-analysis of published observational studies. METHOD: Two cohort and 22 case-control studies presenting results for at least three categories of alcohol intake were identified from a PubMed search of articles published before July 2014. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Random effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta regression were performed for modeling the dose-response relation. RESULT: The pooled relative risk (RR) for any alcohol intake compared with non/occasional drinking was 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.17]. The RRs were 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02-1.13), 1.23 (95% CI, 1.15-1.32) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.26-1.49) for light (≤12.5 g/day), moderate (12.6 to 49.9 g/day) and heavy drinking (≥50 g/day), respectively. The risks were consistent in the subgroup analyses of sex and tumor site. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides strong evidence for an association between alcohol intake and colorectal cancer risk.
33
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider et al. · BMJ · 1997 · 56.3K citations
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson · Statistics in Medicine · 2002 · 36.7K citations