Comparison of Bricker and Wallace Methods of Ureteroileal Anastomosis in Urinary Diversions

Abstract

No AccessJournal of Urology1 May 1974Comparison of Bricker and Wallace Methods of Ureteroileal Anastomosis in Urinary Diversions Julius O. Esho, Roger J. Vitko, Gerald W. Ireland, and Alexander S. Cass Julius O. EshoJulius O. Esho More articles by this author , Roger J. VitkoRoger J. Vitko More articles by this author , Gerald W. IrelandGerald W. Ireland Current address: 1950 Jefferson St., Napa, California, 94558. More articles by this author , and Alexander S. CassAlexander S. Cass More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)60024-7AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1974 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByEvangelidis A, Lee E, Karellas M, Thrasher J and Holzbeierlein J (2018) Evaluation of Ureterointestinal Anastomosis: Wallace vs BrickerJournal of Urology, VOL. 175, NO. 5, (1755-1758), Online publication date: 1-May-2006. Volume 111Issue 5May 1974Page: 600-602 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1974 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Julius O. Esho More articles by this author Roger J. Vitko More articles by this author Gerald W. Ireland Current address: 1950 Jefferson St., Napa, California, 94558. More articles by this author Alexander S. Cass More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...