White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2003 · 263 citations · 1 references
Housing is a vital, complex asset linked to livelihoods, health, education, security, and social stability, yet it is highly vulnerable and its destruction is a prominent consequence of conflict and natural disasters, presenting significant challenges for reconstruction. The paper argues that housing reconstruction must be a central component of post‑conflict and disaster programming and that agencies need improved methods to achieve better outcomes. The authors review post‑disaster and post‑conflict housing reconstruction experiences and provide guidance on planning, available approaches, and common implementation models.
Housing is essential to the wellbeing and development of most societies. It is a complex asset, with links to livelihoods, health, education, security and social and family stability. Housing is also an extremely vulnerable asset, and the destruction of homes or their loss athrough displacement or dispossession is one of the most visible effects of conflict and natural disaster. This paper argues that housing reconstruction should be a more prominent part of programming after conflict and disaster. Housing interventions face significant challenges that cannot simply be wished away. But if agencies are going to continue to do housing reconstruction in the aftermath of conflict and disaster, then there is a clear need to find ways of doing it better. This paper reviews experiences in housing reconstruction in the aftermath of natural disaster and conflict. It offers guidance on how to plan and prepare for a housing reconstruction intervention;describes the various housing reconstruction approaches available; and sets out the various models of implementation that tend to be used.
1