OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 1986 · 17 citations · 0 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringMaterials EngineeringStructural AnalysisStructural EngineeringStructural MaterialsCrack AssessmentDuctilityFracture CharacterizationFracture MechanicsFracture PropagationFracture ResistanceBendingCrack DepthCrack InitiationCrack Initiation ModelingFracture AssessmentFracture Mechanics ExperimentsPipe Failure AnalysisPipes
In this study the validity of various analyses to predict crack initiation, maximum load, and the corresponding displacements for 6.625-inch (168-mm) diameter circumferentially complex-cracked pipe under pure bending was assessed. The results of six pipe fracture experiments on three materials (SA-376 TP304 stainless steel, Inconel 600, and A106 Grade B carbon steel) were used to verify the accuracy of these analytical predictions. Three different sets of analyses were conducted. First, the experimental pipe fracture data were compared with net-section-collapse predicted loads. These comparisons showed that some of the complex-cracked pipes failed at loads 23 to 33% below net-section-collapse predicted loads. Second, J-resistance (J-R) curves were calculated from each pipe experiment using the eta-factor method. These results revealed that the J-R curves from the complex-cracked pipe experiments were significantly less than J-R curves from 0.5T compact (tension) specimens. Furthermore, the pipe J-R curves decreased systematically with increasing ratios of surface crack depth to pipe wall thickness. Third, predictions of loads and displacements in each experiment were made using four different J-estimation schemes. Good agreement was obtained between the predictions and the experimental data up to maximum load. Once past maximum load, however, the J-estimation schemes overpredicted loads and displacements.