Psychosocial Impact of Laryngectomy Mediated by Perceived Stigma and Illness Intrusiveness ^*

Abstract

In addition to prolonging life, successful treatment by laryngectomy also results in functional disability (loss of speech) and physical disfigurement (stoma). It was hypothesized that these after-effects contribute to perceived stigma which, in turn, compromises quality of life. The hypothesis that the psychosocial impact of perceived stigma operates through illness intrusiveness--illness-induced disruptions that interfere with continued involvements in valued activities and interests--was tested. Data were collected from 51 laryngectomy recipients via standardized interviews. As hypothesized, results indicated that: 1. both perceived stigma and illness intrusiveness are related to psychosocial well-being and emotional distress; 2. illness intrusiveness mediates the relation between perceived stigma and psychosocial outcomes; 3. the psychosocial impact of illness intrusiveness is most devastating in the context of highly stigmatized self-perception; and 4. unique profiles of illness intrusiveness across individual life domains may be associated with specific psychosocial outcomes. Findings are discussed in relation to the hypothesis that illness intrusiveness is a common underlying determinant of the psychosocial impact of chronic illness.