Water Science & Technology · 1999 · 70 citations · 16 references
EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringWater Resources ManagementEnvironmental RemediationWastewater TreatmentWater TreatmentConstructed WetlandsWetland EngineeringWetland FunctionWetland HydrologyWetland ManagementConstructed Wetland TreatmentMunicipal Wastewater ManagementMunicipal Wastewater TreatmentNutrient Removal In WetlandsRemovalRemoval EfficiencySubsurface Flow WetlandsSubsurface Horizontal Flow Wetlands
Treatment performance of a field-scale horizontal subsurface (SF) constructed wetland (CW) was evaluated for removal efficiency of BOD, TSS, NH 4 -N, NO 3 -N, TKN and P from municipal wastewater emanating from a small community of residential areas in Ujjain, Central India. The SF wetland had a rectangular size and covered an effective surface area of 41.82 m 2 with a water retention capacity of 18 m 3 . The SF medium was composed of a gravel bed supported below on a layer of puddled local clay and overlaid by a thin synthetic liner. CW was planted initially with locally grown grass, Phragmites karka. Plants placed in this rectangular design at the rate of 3 to 4 plants per m 2 increased to 6157 plants within ten months producing a biomass of 121 tonnes ha −1 . The influent was pretreated before entering the SF system, through two baffles; a grass covered small ditch, followed by a narrow tunnel of packed biofilmed boulders. Removal rates of TSS (48%), TKN (36%), NH 4 -N (22%) and NO 3 -N as zero percent were realised. An earthen channel provided initial pretreatment by a land treatment system. Average treatment performance after five months from this SF system recorded removal efficiencies of 78% for NH 4 -N, TSS; 58-65% for P, BOD and TKN. Effluent dissolved oxygen levels increased to 34% indicating existence of aerobic conditions in the rooted-gravel bed. The SF system overall results established: (a) very cost-effective treatment technology, (b) SF removal efficiency above 50% for BOD, NH 4 -N, TKN, and P. This SF system presents a unique design consideration compared with the land-intensive Kickuth standard system design.
16