Publication | Closed Access
The case for common reference intervals.
48
Citations
8
References
2004
Year
Common Reference IntervalsPoint-of-care TestingDiagnosisPathologyDiagnostic TestInterval AnalysisBiostatisticsCurrent ParadigmPublic HealthLaboratory MedicineStatisticsHealth InformaticsPathology Reference IntervalsPathology ProfessionClinical DataEpidemiologyInterval ComputationMedicineClinical Database
The current paradigm for pathology reference intervals is for each laboratory to determine its own interval for use with each test offered by the laboratory. It is our contention that this approach does not best serve the medical community, especially at a time when electronic databases of health information are being expanded and integrated. We also believe that this approach is not performed well in many laboratories and is excessively expensive in practice. In contrast, we believe that the preferable option is to develop and apply common reference intervals throughout Australia and New Zealand, together with common reporting formats and assay standardisation wherever this is possible. We are aware that these are neither trivial nor simple issues, however we believe that failure to achieve this goal where technically possible will be a failure of the pathology profession to meet the challenges of the modern health community.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1