PubMed · 1995 · 12 citations · 0 references
MedicineGynecologyObstetricsGynecologic UltrasoundIn Vitro FertilizationReproductive MedicineEndometrial AssessmentPregnancyUterine UltrasoundEndometrial EchogenicityEndometrial FindingsEndometrial Pattern AssessmentPositive Predictive ValuePositive Predictive Value Estimation
In order to assess the relationship between echographic endometrial thickness and pattern and the probability of clinical pregnancy and delivery we analyzed retrospectively 51 cycles of IFV-ET. Patients were classified in three categories of endometrial thickness: < 9 mm, 9.1-11 mm and > 11 mm and in two types of endometrial pattern: type 1 (non triple line) or type 2 (triple line). The average endometrial thickness of patients who got pregnant and those who did not was 11.8 +/- 1.8 mm and 10.6 +/- 1.7 mm respectively (p = NS). There were no clinical pregnancies in patients with endometrial thickness < 9 mm (p < 0.01). The average endometrial thickness in patients with endometrial pattern type 1 and type 2 was 11.1 +/- 1.2 mm and 10.9 +/- 1.9 mm respectively (p = NS). Patients who presented type 2 endometrial pattern (n = 39) produced eleven clinical pregnancies (28.2%) and those with type 1 (n = 2) only one clinical pregnancy (8.3%), which ended in spontaneous abortion (p < 0.01). When both variables, thickness and pattern, were considered together, patients with endometrial pattern type 2 and thickness > 11 mm had a probability of clinical pregnancy and of delivery of 43.8% and 25%, respectively, who is statistically significant (p < 0.03). We conclude that endometrial thickness and pattern, taken together, offer a valuable prognostic value for the outcome of an IVF-ET cycle.