Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) · 2009 · 15 citations · 41 references
Open access
EducationEducational PsychologyPsychologyCreativityGenderIndividual DifferencesAcademic FunctioningCreativity AssessmentGender DifferencesIndividual CreativityIntelligence AssessmentAcademic Achievement AssessmentCreativity TestsCross-sectional Correlation StudyGender Differences In AchievementIndependent VariablesIndividual Differences In CreativityMultiple Regression
The purpose of this cross – sectional study was to assess prediction of intelligence, creativity and gender on academic achievement among undergraduate students. Participants (N= 153, 105 = male & 48= female) completed intelligence and creativity tests which were compared with their cumulative grade point average (CGPA). A multiple regression analysis indicated that intelligence, creativity and gender explained 0.045 of the variance in academic achievement, which is not significant, as indicated by the F- value of 2.334. Multiple regression analyses also indicated that intelligence and creativity (gender is controlled) together explained 0.010 of the variance in academic achievement, which is also not significant, as indicated by the F- value of 1.562. Partial correlations between academic achievement and IQ, creativity scores and gender were non significant at .05. Coefficients also showed there is no significance between academic achievement and IQ and gender at .05, except for creativity (t= 2.008, p= 0.046). Finding shows predicting lower independent variables of this study (scores of intelligence, creativity and gender) on academic achievement (CGPA).
41
Claude M. Ury, Elchanan Cohn · Southern Economic Journal · 1980 · 2.3K citations
Intelligence and educational achievement
Ian J. Deary, Steve Strand, Pauline Smith et al. · Intelligence · 2006 · 1.7K citations
Education, Educational Measurement, Educational Psychology +12
Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns.
Ulric Neisser, Gwyneth M. Boodoo, Jr. Bouchard Thomas J. et al. · American Psychologist · 1996 · 1.6K citations