International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications · 2012 · 135 citations · 13 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine LearningRoboticsClassificationImage ClassificationObject DetectionObject RecognitionPattern RecognitionSupport Vector MachinesBag Of Visual WordsK-nearest NeighborsNearest-neighbor ClassificationObject ClassificationSupport Vector ClassificationSupport Vector Machine ClassificationSvms
In order for a robot or a computer to perform tasks, it must recognize what it is looking at. Given an image a computer must be able to classify what the image represents. While this is a fairly simple task for humans, it is not an easy task for computers. Computers must go through a series of steps in order to classify a single image. In this paper, we used a general Bag of Words model in order to compare two different classification methods. Both K-Nearest-Neighbor (KNN) and Support-Vector-Machine (SVM) classification are well known and widely used. We were able to observe that the SVM classifier outperformed the KNN classifier. For future work, we hope to use more categories for the objects and to use more sophisticated classifiers.
13
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 33K citations · Full text
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
David Lowe · 1999 · 16.2K citations
A feature-integration theory of attention
Anne Treisman, Garry A. Gelade · Cognitive Psychology · 1980 · 12.4K citations
Medicine, Psychology, Vision Science +12
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
Bernhard E. Boser, Isabelle Guyon, Vladimir Vapnik · 1992 · 11.6K citations