Stanford Law Review · 1992 · 48 citations · 0 references
LawJurisprudenceTort LawMass TortsProduct LiabilityStrict LiabilityDefective ProductsTobacco Control LawTobacco LitigationTort TheoryToxic Exposure ClaimsToxic TortsCausation In Tobacco LitigationPolitical Activism HistoryStrict Liability DefensesStrict Liability InfringementStrict Liability PrincipleTobacco Industry LitigationTort Law History
Nostalgia buffs hold the 1950s in especially high regard. It is generally thought to be the last decade of America's innocence-a period of relative quiescence in which political activism was at a low ebb. Post-war industrial growth had brought unprecedented economic prosperity, but misgivings about the costs of the new affluence-the development of a refined sensitivity to health and safety concerns that would strongly influence popular attitudes beginning in the next decade-had yet to arise.l Tort law, on the whole, mirrored these cultural themes. By the late 1960s, what would be heralded as a revolution in products law had begun, reflected in the adoption of strict liability for defective products.2 Spurred on by a newly emerging concern about toxic exposures and a broader-based rise in claims consciousness on the part of the public, tort awards and tort doctrine were swept up in a period of legal turbulence that