No disagreement in DP pulses. However, all observers agreed on the presence of a PT pulse in only 70% of limbs. Claudicants: There was better agreement in palpation of the DP pulse (all observers agreed in 67% of limbs), than the PT pulse (all agreed in 53%). This suggests that the DP pulse is easier to palpate than the PT (P less than 0.05). By contrast there was better agreement on Doppler signals from the PT artery, all agreed in 78% of limbs; compared with the DP artery, all agreed in 58% (P less than 0.01). Pressure measurements by the observers agreed to within +/- 0.15 in 88% of claudicant and 100% of control limbs. Pedal pulse palpation in patients with arterial disease is subject to substantial observer error. Doppler pressure measurement is preferable unless pulses are bounding.
4
Observer variability in recording the peripheral pulses.
T W Meade, M J Gardner, P Cannon et al. · Heart · 1968 · 69 citations · Full text
Significance of Absent Ankle Pulse
John Ludbrook, Alex M. Clarke, J. K. McKenzie · BMJ · 1962 · 47 citations · Full text
Electrophysiological Evaluation, Kinesiology, Health Sciences +8
Kenneth A. Myers, Danny W. Scott, Terry J. Devine et al. · European Journal of Vascular Surgery · 1987 · 31 citations
Electrophysiological Evaluation, Kinesiology, Health Sciences +10