Fine-bore cannulas for peripheral intravenous nutrition: polyurethane or silicone?

Abstract

The peripheral intravenous route is being used more frequently for the administration of short- to medium-term parenteral nutritional support. Dedicated fine bore cannulas have significantly reduced the incidence of thrombophlebitis. Currently available cannulas are made of polyurethane or silicone. We present our experience with a 23G silicone cannula and a 22G polyurethane alternative. Fifty-four silicone cannulas were used with a median survival of only 3 days, compared with 7 days for 90 polyurethane cannulas (P < 0.0001). Only 22% of silicone cannulas were removed electively compared with 56% of polyurethane cannulas (P < 0.00005). The most common cause for silicone cannula removal was occlusion (48%), which occurred in only 8% of polyurethane cannulas (P < 0.00001). Polyurethane cannulas develop fewer complications and are more effective in the delivery of peripheral intravenous nutritional support.