Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage with packed bed thermal energy storage

Edward Barbour, Dimitri Mignard, Yulong Ding, Yongliang Li

Applied Energy · 2015 · 264 citations · 40 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Adiabatic compressed‑air energy storage has mainly been studied with indirect‑contact heat exchangers and thermal fluids, while packed‑bed storage has been proposed but lacks detailed analysis. This study provides a detailed analysis of A‑CAES with packed‑bed thermal energy storage. The authors develop and validate a numerical model of a packed‑bed A‑CAES system and perform an exergy analysis of a charge–storage–discharge cycle to locate major losses. The analysis predicts an efficiency exceeding 70 %, with the largest losses in compressors and expanders (~20 % of work input), and shows that continuous cycling causes heat buildup in the beds, reducing efficiency by less than 0.5 %.

Abstract

The majority of articles on Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) so far have focussed on the use of indirect-contact heat exchangers and a thermal fluid in which to store the compression heat. While packed beds have been suggested, a detailed analysis of A-CAES with packed beds is lacking in the available literature. This paper presents such an analysis. We develop a numerical model of an A-CAES system with packed beds and validate it against analytical solutions. Our results suggest that an efficiency in excess of 70% should be achievable, which is higher than many of the previous estimates for A-CAES systems using indirect-contact heat exchangers. We carry out an exergy analysis for a single charge–storage–discharge cycle to see where the main losses are likely to transpire and we find that the main losses occur in the compressors and expanders (accounting for nearly 20% of the work input) rather than in the packed beds. The system is then simulated for continuous cycling and it is found that the build-up of leftover heat from previous cycles in the packed beds results in higher steady state temperature profiles of the packed beds. This leads to a small reduction (<0.5%) in efficiency for continuous operation.

References

40