Ecology and Society · 2009 · 1.3K citations · 81 references
Life SciencesEcologyZoologyMammalogyPopulation EcologyWildlife BiologyAnimal EcologyWildlife BehaviorWildlife ConservationWildlife EcologyWildlife-habitat RelationshipsAttributesPopulation-level ResponsesReproductive RatesRoad EcologySpecies AbundanceSpecies Abundance AnalysisSpecies Abundance DistributionsWildlife Impacts
We attempted a complete review of the empirical literature on effects of roads and traffic on animal abundance and distribution. We found 79 studies, with results for 131 species and 30 species groups. Overall, the number of documented negative effects of roads on animal abundance outnumbered the number of positive effects by a factor of 5; 114 responses were negative, 22 were positive, and 56 showed no effect. Amphibians and reptiles tended to show negative effects. Birds showed mainly negative or no effects, with a few positive effects for some small birds and for vultures. Small mammals generally showed either positive effects or no effect, mid-sized mammals showed either negative effects or no effect, and large mammals showed predominantly negative effects. We synthesized this information, along with information on species attributes, to develop a set of predictions of the conditions that lead to negative or positive effects or no effect of roads on animal abundance. Four species types are predicted to respond negatively to roads: (i) species that are attracted to roads and are unable to avoid individual cars; (ii) species with large movement ranges, low reproductive rates, and low natural densities; and (iii and iv) small animals whose populations are not limited by road-affected predators and either (a) avoid habitat near roads due to traffic disturbance or (b) show no avoidance of roads or traffic disturbance and are unable to avoid oncoming cars. Two species types are predicted to respond positively to roads: (i) species that are attracted to roads for an important resource (e.g., food) and are able to avoid oncoming cars, and (ii) species that do not avoid traffic disturbance but do avoid roads, and whose main predators show negative population-level responses to roads. Other conditions lead to weak or non-existent effects of roads and traffic on animal abundance. We identify areas where further research is needed, but we also argue that the evidence for populationlevel effects of roads and traffic is already strong enough to merit routine consideration of mitigation of these effects in all road construction and maintenance projects.
81
Road ecology: science and solutions
Choice Reviews Online · 2003 · 1.9K citations
Architecture, Landscape Ecology, Transportation Planning +17
Effect of road traffic on amphibian density
Lenore Fahrig, John Pedlar, Shealagh E. Pope et al. · Biological Conservation · 1995 · 665 citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Ecology, Zoology +11
The effect of road kills on amphibian populations
Tove Hels, Erik Buchwald · Biological Conservation · 2001 · 484 citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Ecology, Zoology +12
Estimating the Effects of Road Mortality on Turtle Populations
James P. Gibbs, W. Gregory Shriver · Conservation Biology · 2002 · 437 citations
Life Sciences, Demography, Ecology +13