Social SciencesPolitical ScienceSociologyInsurgencyPolitical BehaviorSocial MovementsActivismPolitical ActivismPolitical RegimesProtest MovementsRegime TypeRepertoires Of ContentionCollective Action In RevolutionsContentious Collective ActionInsurgent MovementsMobilization DynamicsPolitical Regime ChangeRegime TypologyRegional Protest MovementsRepertoire Of Mobilization
Protest repertoires vary markedly across regimes, with powerful authoritarian states such as China producing many citizen protests despite lacking visible social movements, while weaker regimes like Sudan experience insurgencies and civil wars. The book examines how different types of governments shape the styles of protest they elicit. By drawing on diverse historical and contemporary cases—from G8 summit protests to 19th‑century Chartists and modern civil wars—Tilly demonstrates that contentious politics unfold like loosely scripted theater and offers analytical tools to link regime characteristics to protest dynamics.
The means by which people protest that is, their repertoires of contention vary radically from one political regime to the next. Highly capable undemocratic regimes such as China's show no visible signs of popular social movements, yet produce many citizen protests against arbitrary, predatory government. Less effective and undemocratic governments like the Sudan s, meanwhile, often experience regional insurgencies and even civil wars. In Regimes and Repertoires, Charles Tilly offers a fascinating and wide-ranging case-by-case study of various types of government and the equally various styles of protests they foster. Using examples drawn from many areas G8 summit and anti-globalization protests, Hindu activism in 1980s India, nineteenth-century English Chartists organizing on behalf of workers' rights, the revolutions of 1848, and civil wars in Angola, Chechnya, and Kosovo Tilly masterfully shows that such episodes of contentious politics unfold like loosely scripted theater. Along the way, Tilly also brings forth powerful tools to sort out the reasons why certain political regimes vary and change, how the people living under them make claims on their government, and what connections can be drawn between regime change and the character of contentious politics.