1988 · 170 citations · 30 references
Geotechnical EngineeringHighway PavementPavement EngineeringEngineeringCritical ReviewTest MethodsEnvironmental EngineeringCivil EngineeringReview SummariesSample TreatmentBiostatisticsAnalytical ChemistryClinical ChemistrySample Pre-treatmentSample PreparationImmersion CompressionAsphaltHma Mixtures
This report reviews the state‑of‑the‑art stripping methods for hot mix asphalt, proposes relationships between stripping theories and mechanisms, and summarizes user survey findings. The review critically evaluates selected stripping tests—Lottman, Tunnicliff‑Root, 10‑Minute Boil, Immersion Compression, and Nevada Dynamic Strip—using a success/failure pattern derived from published data. The critical review ranks the stripping tests as Lottman, Tunnicliff‑Root, 10‑Minute Boil, Immersion Compression, and Nevada Dynamic Strip, indicating the relative performance of each method.
This report presents review summaries of the state-of-the-art regarding stripping in hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. The review stresses efforts concerned with methods development and evaluation, and presents a critical review of select methods including Lottman (NCHRP 246), Tunnicliff-Root (NCHRP 274), Immersion Compression, 10-Minute Boil Test, and the Nevada Dynamic Strip Method. The results of the critical review of methods indicated the following ranking order: Lottman Test, Tunnicliff-Root Test, 10-Minute Boil Test, Immersion Compression, and Nevada Dynamic Strip Test. The basis of the analysis was a proposed success/failure pattern which was developed using published data on stripping. Other products of this research include: proposed relationship between stripping theories and mechanisms, and an appended summary of findings from surveys of the users of the stripping tests.
30
J C Petersen, H Plancher, E K Ensley et al. · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 1982 · 70 citations
Materials Science, Geotechnical Engineering, Highway Pavement +12