Greater number of group identifications is associated with lower odds of being depressed: evidence from a Scottish community sample

Fabio Sani, Vishnu Madhok, Michael Norbury, Pat Dugard, Juliet R. H. Wakefield

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · 2015 · 71 citations · 25 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

PURPOSE: Group identification has been shown to be associated with reduced risk of depression, but this research has important limitations. Our aim was to establish a robust link between group identification and depression whilst overcoming previous studies' shortcomings. METHODS: 1824 participants, recruited from General Practice throughout Scotland, completed a questionnaire measuring their identification with three groups (family, community, and a group of their choice), as well as their intensity of contact with each group. They also completed a self-rated depression measure and provided demographic information. Their medical records were also accessed to determine if they had been prescribed antidepressants in the previous 6 months. RESULTS: The number of group identifications was associated with both lower self-rated depression and lower odds of having received a prescription for antidepressants, even after controlling for the number of contact-intensive groups, level of education, gender, age, and relationship status. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying with multiple groups may help to protect individuals against depression. This highlights the potential importance of social prescriptions, where health professionals encourage a depressed patient to become a member of one or more groups with which the patient believes he/she would be likely to identify.

References

25