PubMed · 2010 · 44 citations · 28 references
MedicineCardiologyInflammationInterventional CardiologyMeta-analysisAcute Coronary SyndromesCardiovascular DiseaseCoronary Artery DiseaseIschemic Heart DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionStent PlacementC-reactive Protein TestingClinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Stent RestenosisCoronary StentingIn-stent ThrombosisResearch ArticlesRestenosis After StentingStent Thrombosis Prevention
We sought to evaluate the impact of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.The plasma level of CRP is considered a risk predictor for cardiovascular diseases. However, the relationship between CRP and in-stent restenosis has been a matter of controversy. Meta-analysis reduces variability and better evaluates the correlation.We performed a systemic search for literature published in March 2008 and earlier, using MEDLINE(R), the Cochrane clinical trials database, and EMBASE(R). We also scanned relevant reference lists and hand-searched all review articles or abstracts from conference reports on this topic. Of the 245 studies that we initially searched, we chose 9 prospective observational studies (1,062 patients).Overall, CRP concentration was higher in patients who experienced in-stent restenosis. The weighted mean difference in CRP levels between the patients with in-stent restenosis and those without was 1.67, and the Z-score for overall effect was 2.12 (P=0.03). Our subgroup analysis that compared patients with stable and unstable angina showed a weighted mean difference in the CRP levels of 2.22 between the patients with and without in-stent restenosis, and the Z-score for overall effect was 2.23 (P=0.03) in 5 studies of unstable-angina patients. There was no significance in 4 studies of stable-angina patients.In spite of significant heterogeneity across the studies, our meta-analysis suggests that preprocedurally elevated levels of CRP are associated with greater in-stent restenosis after stenting and that this impact appears more prominent in unstable-angina patients.
28
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider et al. · BMJ · 1997 · 56.3K citations
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson · Statistics in Medicine · 2002 · 36.7K citations