Eprints@CMFRI Open Access Institutional Repository (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute) · 1993 · 10 citations · 0 references
Open access
Natural ResourcesFisheriesMarine SciencesFisheries ManagementIchthyologyStock AssessmentFish Fisheries BiologyFish Population AssessmentFish Stock AssessmentFisheries ProductivityCrustacean Fisheries BiologyFish Stock ProductivityFishery Stock AssessmentFishery Stock DynamicsMarine Fish Stock AssessmentNatural Mortality EstimationNatural Mortality Rate EstimationStock Distribution Assessment
The data collected during 1979 to 1989 at different centres on both the coasts of India, indicate \nthat the landings of the cuttlefish Sepia pharaonis Ehrenberg, increased by 3 times (11,000 t in 1989). \nOver 84% was from the west coast, with Maharashtra accounting for 44% and Kerala 33%. About 87% \nof cuttlefish is obtained in trawl net as by-catch, while a small portion is taken in localized hand-jigging \noperation. On the east coast over 63% of the total catch is during the second and third quarters of the \nyear (April-September). On the west coast the fourth quarter is the most productive (50%), the second \nquarter being the least. The natural mortality (M) ranges from 1.08 to 1.8 iot males and 1.23 to 2.05 \nfor females on the east coast; on the west coast the corresponding values were 1.41-2.35 and 1.5 - 2.5. \nOn both the coasts the M for females was higher than for males. On the east coast the maximum values \nof fishing mortality ('F' in the range 1.65-2.9 in male cuttlefish) was observed at a size of 170 mm; \nfor females it is at 190 mm in the range 1.95 - 2.8. On the west coast it is at a uniform size of 190 \nmm in the range 1.27 - 2.14 in males and 1.33 -1.66 in females. The standing stock of male cuttlefish \nis higher than that of females on the east coast, while the reverse is true for the west coast. Using \nThompson and Bell long-term forecast analysis the MSY and mean biomass at different M/K levels are \nalso estimated for males and females separately for each coast. Tlie present level of exploitation is \nconsidered to be optimal on the east coast, whereas on the west coast there is scope for increase.