Energy storage materials · 2025 · 12 citations · 163 references
Natural SciencesChemical EngineeringMaterials ScienceElectrochemistryEnergy MaterialsMaterials ChemistryAnode MaterialsBattery MaterialsElectrochemical Energy StorageElectrode MaterialsElectrolyte MaterialsEnergy Storage MaterialsElectrolyte InterphaseElectrolytesLithium-ion BatteriesLithium-metal AnodesLithium-metal BatteriesLithium-sulfur BatteriesSolid-electrolyte InterphaseSolid-electrolyte Interphase Formation
Metal–sulfur batteries, particularly lithium–sulfur (Li–S) systems, have attracted significant attention due to their high theoretical energy densities, low cost, and sustainability benefits arising from sulfur’s abundance and non-toxicity. Despite extensive research, their practical deployment remains limited by persistent challenges such as polysulfide shuttling and metal anode degradation, which collectively lead to poor coulombic efficiency and limited cycle life. These issues are further intensified in emerging systems employing sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and siliconbased anodes. Fluorinated electrolytes have emerged as a promising approach to address these limitations. Fluorination enhances oxidative stability, suppresses polysulfide dissolution, promotes stable solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation, and improves safety. Although widely studied in lithium-ion and lithium-metal batteries, fluorinated electrolytes remain underexplored in metal–sulfur systems, despite growing evidence of their potential to mitigate key degradation pathways. This review provides a mechanism-focused analysis of fluorinated electrolytes for metal–sulfur batteries, with a particular emphasis on Li–S systems. It begins by assessing the limitations of conventional electrolytes and examines how fluorinated solvents, salts, and additives influence polysulfide solubility, electrode interfacial stability, and overall electrochemical performance. The discussion then extends to emerging non-lithium metal–sulfur systems, where fluorinated electrolytes can improve stability. Environmental and economic considerations are addressed, followed by an outlook on key parameters and target goals for realizing practical metal–sulfur batteries by leveraging fluorinated electrolytes. By connecting electrolyte design to specific failure mechanisms, this review establishes a framework for targeted materials development and outlines future directions for advancing high-performance, practical metal–sulfur batteries.
163
Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries
John B. Goodenough, Youngsik Kim · Chemistry of Materials · 2009 · 10.8K citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +10
Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries
Wu Xu, Jiulin Wang, Fei Ding et al. · Energy & Environmental Science · 2013 · 4.6K citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +17
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Jiangfeng Qian, Wesley A. Henderson, Wu Xu et al. · Nature Communications · 2015 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +17