The Oncologist · 2025 · 25 citations · 24 references
MedicineOncologyBreast OncologyChemotherapyMetastasisBreast Cancer OncologyBreast Cancer RecurrenceMetastatic Breast CancerMetastatic Cancer ManagementMetastatic Disease ManagementElectronic Health Record DataMetastatic Breast Cancer TreatmentRecurrent Metastatic DiseaseSingle-agent ChemotherapyTriple-negative Breast Cancer RecurrenceTriple-negative Breast Cancer TherapyUnmet Health NeedUnmet Healthcare Need
BACKGROUND: This real-world study describes the treatment landscape evolution after targeted therapy approval and associated survival outcomes for previously untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used de-identified electronic health record-derived data of patients diagnosed with mTNBC (January 2011-July 2022; index date was first-line [1L] treatment start date). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, real-world overall survival (rwOS), and time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) were determined. Outcomes before (2011-2017, early cohort) and after (2018-2022, late cohort) targeted therapy approval were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 2004 eligible patients, 21% were classified as Black, 13% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and 63% were diagnosed with recurrent disease; median age was 60 years. First-line chemotherapy-only (single- and multiple-agent chemotherapy) use decreased with the introduction of targeted therapies from 96% before 2018 to 65% between 2019 and 2022. From 2019, 33% of patients received programmed death-(ligand) 1 inhibitor-based regimen; ~2% received poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Median 1L treatment duration was 2.6 months and this did not change over time. Of all 1L patients, 34% died before second-line (2L) and 51% subsequently received 2L treatment. Median (95% CI) 1L rwOS and TTNTD were 11.3 (10.7-12.0) months and 4.3 (4.1-4.6) months, respectively. Median 1L 5-year survival [95% CI] showed statistically significant but small improvement from the early (10.9 [10.3-11.6] months) to late cohort (11.9 [10.7-13.1] months; HR [95% CI], 0.87 [0.78-0.96]). CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrated that, despite changes in care over time, survival improvements were not clinically meaningful; thus, a substantial unmet need for more efficacious treatments in previously untreated patients with mTNBC remains.
24
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence
Rebecca Dent, Maureen Trudeau, Kathleen I. Pritchard et al. · Clinical Cancer Research · 2007 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022
Angela N. Giaquinto, Hyuna Sung, Kimberly D. Miller et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2022 · 2.4K citations · Full text
3rd ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)
Fátima Cardoso, A. Costa, Elżbieta Senkus et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2016 · 2.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +11