AI · 2024 · 11 citations · 49 references
ComputingBioinformaticsOncologyData MiningMachine LearningTranscriptomicsCancer TranscriptomicsDecision TreesExplainable Machine LearningFeature SelectionTranscriptomic ProfilingTumor ClassificationCancer BioinformaticsExplainable Artificial IntelligenceExplainable Data MiningGene Expression SignaturesGenomic Feature SelectionLung AdenocarcinomaShapley Value ExplanationsTransparency
This study investigates the use of machine learning (ML) models combined with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to identify the most influential genes in the classification of five recurrent cancer types in women: breast cancer (BRCA), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), thyroid cancer (THCA), ovarian cancer (OV), and colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). Gene expression data from RNA-seq, extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), were used to train ML models, including decision trees (DTs), random forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB), which achieved accuracies of 98.69%, 99.82%, and 99.37%, respectively. However, the challenges in this analysis included the high dimensionality of the dataset and the lack of transparency in the ML models. To mitigate these challenges, the SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) method was applied to generate a list of features, aiming to understand which characteristics influenced the models’ decision-making processes and, consequently, the prediction results for the five tumor types. The SHAP analysis identified 119, 80, and 10 genes for the RF, XGB, and DT models, respectively, totaling 209 genes, resulting in 172 unique genes. The new list, representing 0.8% of the original input features, is coherent and fully explainable, increasing confidence in the applied models. Additionally, the results suggest that the SHAP method can be effectively used as a feature selector in gene expression data. This approach not only enhances model transparency but also maintains high classification performance, highlighting its potential in identifying biologically relevant features that may serve as biomarkers for cancer diagnostics and treatment planning.
49
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data
Antonio Colaprico, Tiago C. Silva, Catharina Olsen et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2015 · 4.5K citations · Full text
A survey on semi-supervised learning
Jesper E. van Engelen, Holger H. Hoos · Machine Learning · 2019 · 2.6K citations · Full text
A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms
Artificial Intelligence Review · 2020 · 2.5K citations · Full text