Physical Review Applied · 2025 · 11 citations · 42 references
ComputingElectrical EngineeringPhysicsMicrowave EngineeringQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsQuantum BitsQuantum CircuitsQuantum ComputationQuantum ControlQuantum GatesSuperconducting QubitsCouplersFlux ControlQubit CalibrationQubit FidelityReadout ResonatorsStrong CouplingStrong Coupling EffectsTwo-qubit Gates
For superconducting quantum processors, stable high-fidelity two-qubit operations depend on precise flux control of the tunable coupler. However, the pulse distortion poses a significant challenge to the control precision. Current calibration methods, which often rely on microwave crosstalk or additional readout resonators for coupler excitation and readout, tend to be cumbersome and inefficient, especially when couplers only have flux control. Here, we introduce and experimentally validate a pulse calibration scheme that exploits the strong coupling between qubits and couplers, eliminating the need for extra coupler readout and excitation. Our method directly measures the short-time and long-time step responses of the coupler flux pulse transient, enabling us to apply predistortion to subsequent signals using fast Fourier transformation and deconvolution. This approach not only simplifies the calibration process, but also significantly improves the precision and stability of the flux control. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method through the implementation of diabatic controlled-$Z$ (cz) and $i$swap gates with fidelities of $99.61\mathrm{%}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.04\mathrm{%}$ and $99.82\mathrm{%}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.02\mathrm{%}$, respectively, as well as a series of diabatic controlled-phase gates with high fidelities characterized by cross-entropy benchmarking. The consistency and robustness of our technique are further validated by the reduction in pulse distortion and phase error observed across multilayer cz gates. These results underscore the potential of our calibration and predistortion method to enhance the performance of two-qubit gates in superconducting quantum processors.
42
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Nature · 2019 · 7K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +14
A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits
Philip Krantz, Fei Yan, Terry P. Orlando et al. · Applied Physics Reviews · 2019 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
Sergio Boixo, Sergei V. Isakov, Vadim Smelyanskiy et al. · Nature Physics · 2018 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Computing, Mathematics, Physics +11
Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit
Rajeev Acharya, I. L. Aleǐner, R. M. Allen et al. · Nature · 2023 · 1.1K citations · Full text