Infliximab versus Cyclophosphamide for Severe Behçet’s Syndrome

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cyclophosphamide and infliximab are recommended as induction therapies for severe Behçet's syndrome. Whether infliximab is safer and more effective than cyclophosphamide in treating severe Behçet's syndrome is not known. METHODS: intravenously at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20, with a maximal dose of 1.2 g/infusion). All patients received the same glucocorticoid regimen. The primary outcome was complete response (clinical, biological, and radiological remission with a daily prednisone dose ≤0.1 mg/kg) at week 22. RESULTS: Between May 2018 and April 2021, 52 patients with severe Behçet's syndrome (n=37 [71%] with vascular Behçet's syndrome and n=15 [29%] with neuro-Behçet's syndrome) were randomly assigned to receive either infliximab or cyclophosphamide. Complete response was achieved by 22 out of 27 (81%) and 14 out of 25 (56%) patients in the infliximab and cyclophosphamide treatment groups, respectively (estimated difference, 29.8 percentage points; 95% credible interval, 6.6 to 51.7). The posterior probability that at least 70% of treated individuals achieved complete response by week 22 was 97.4% for infliximab and 6.0% for cyclophosphamide. Overall, adverse events were recorded in 8 out of 27 (29.6%) patients receiving infliximab and 16 out of 25 (64%) patients receiving cyclophosphamide (estimated difference, -32.3 percentage points; 95% credible interval, -55.2 to -6.6). Serious adverse events were reported in 15% and 12% of patients receiving infliximab and cyclophosphamide, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe Behçet's syndrome, induction therapy with infliximab had a superior complete response rate at 22 weeks and fewer adverse events than induction with cyclophosphamide. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health.).