IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · 2024 · 146 citations · 48 references
ComputingData ScienceForecastingTechnology ForecastingTime Series AnalysisForecast EvaluationForecast VerificationMultivariate ForecastingTime Series AnalyticsTime Series ForecastingTime Series PredictionBenchmark DatasetsBenchmarking Time Series ForecastingMultivariate Time Series ClassificationMultivariate Time Series ForecastingMultivariate Time Series ModelingPrediction BenchmarkingTraining Pipeline PlanningUnbiased Evaluation
Multivariate Time Series (MTS) analysis is crucial to understanding and managing complex systems, such as traffic and energy systems, and a variety of approaches to MTS forecasting have been proposed recently. However, we often observe inconsistent or seemingly contradictory performance findings across different studies. This hinders our understanding of the merits of different approaches and slows down progress. We address the need for means of assessing MTS forecasting proposals reliably and fairly, in turn enabling better exploitation of MTS as seen in different applications. Specifically, we first propose BasicTS+, a benchmark designed to enable fair, comprehensive, and reproducible comparison of MTS forecasting solutions. BasicTS+ establishes a unified training pipeline and reasonable settings, enabling an unbiased evaluation. Second, we identify the heterogeneity across different MTS as an important consideration and enable classification of MTS based on their temporal and spatial characteristics. Disregarding this heterogeneity is a prime reason for difficulties in selecting the most promising technical directions. Third, we apply BasicTS+ along with rich datasets to assess the capabilities of more than 30 MTS forecasting solutions. This provides readers with an overall picture of the cutting-edge research on MTS forecasting.
48
DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · 2023 · 76.3K citations · Full text
Laurens van der Maaten, Geoffrey E. Hinton · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2008 · 35.7K citations