An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

David J. Wright, Matthew W. Scott, Sarah N. Kraeutner, Pamela Barhoun, Maurizio Bertollo, Mark J. Campbell, Baptiste M Waltzing, Stephan F. Dahm, Maaike Esselaar, Cornelia Frank,

Frontiers in Psychology · 2024 · 25 citations · 33 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

References

33