Frontiers in Psychology · 2024 · 25 citations · 33 references
MedicineBehavioral SciencesPsychologyVisual DisordersVisual NeuroscienceVisual PerceptionMental ImageryVisual CognitionVisual ImpairmentVisual Impairment EpidemiologyVisual SystemBehavioral Assessment Of VisionClinical Vision DisordersImagery AbilitiesVisual Imagery ImpairmentVisuospatial Abilities
The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.
33
The Chi-square test of independence
Mary L. McHugh · Biochemia Medica · 2013 · 2.7K citations · Full text
VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURES
David F Marks · British Journal of Psychology · 1973 · 1.8K citations
Phantasia–The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes
Adam Zeman, Fraser Milton, Sergio Della Sala et al. · Cortex · 2020 · 325 citations · Full text