1c:I[419806,["/_next/static/chunks/bb923814e1f4d2e9.js","/_next/static/chunks/dd3ee9f5b7716ca6.js","/_next/static/chunks/4204a0ae82542ca8.js","/_next/static/chunks/1270dead247da766.js","/_next/static/chunks/6e1aa89a642f40be.js","/_next/static/chunks/2d7aa753e81324a8.js","/_next/static/chunks/8ffd0b71567920d8.js","/_next/static/chunks/67ea6dfd21f16c5f.js","/_next/static/chunks/24eb4379f68013fd.js","/_next/static/chunks/b8cd775ffdf935bd.js","/_next/static/chunks/983103cd9eb7b428.js","/_next/static/chunks/263f2cdcb9aa2341.js","/_next/static/chunks/294b9525248c8e5f.js"],"default"] 1d:T518,Abstract Li deposition is observed and measured on a solid electrolyte in the vicinity of a metallic current collector. Four types of ion‐conducting, inorganic solid electrolytes are tested: Amorphous 70/30 mol% Li 2 S‐P 2 S 5 , polycrystalline β‐Li 3 PS 4 , and polycrystalline and single‐crystalline Li 6 La 3 ZrTaO 12 garnet. The nature of lithium plating depends on the proximity of the current collector to defects such as surface cracks and on the current density. Lithium plating penetrates/infiltrates at defects, but only above a critical current density. Eventually, infiltration results in a short circuit between the current collector and the Li‐source (anode). These results do not depend on the electrolytes shear modulus and are thus not consistent with the Monroe–Newman model for “dendrites.” The observations suggest that Li‐plating in pre‐existing flaws produces crack‐tip stresses which drive crack propagation, and an electrochemomechanical model of plating‐induced Li infiltration is proposed. Lithium short‐circuits through solid electrolytes occurs through a fundamentally different process than through liquid electrolytes. The onset of Li infiltration depends on solid‐state electrolyte surface morphology, in particular the defect size and density.1e:T465,Sulfide-based solid electrolytes are promising candidates for all solid-state batteries (ASSBs) due to their high ionic conductivity and ease of processability. However, their narrow electrochemical stability window causes undesirable electrolyte decomposition. Existing literature on Li-ion ASSBs report an irreversible nature of such decompositions, while Li–S ASSBs show evidence of some reversibility. Here, we explain these observations by investigating the redox mechanism of argyrodite Li6PS5Cl at various chemical potentials. We found that Li–In | Li6PS5Cl | Li6PS5Cl–C half-cells can be cycled reversibly, delivering capacities of 965 mAh g–1 for the electrolyte itself. During charging, Li6PS5Cl forms oxidized products of sulfur (S) and phosphorus pentasulfide (P2S5), while during discharge, these products are first reduced to a Li3PS4 intermediate before forming lithium sulfide (Li2S) and lithium phosphide (Li3P). Finally, we quantified the relative contributions of the products toward cell impedance and proposed a strategy to reduce electrolyte decomposition and increase cell Coulombic efficiency.1f:T516,Developing high-performance all-solid-state batteries is contingent on finding solid electrolyte materials with high ionic conductivity and ductility. Here we report new halide-rich solid solution phases in the argyrodite Li₆ PS₅ Cl family, Li_6-x PS_5-x Cl_1+x , and combine electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, neutron diffraction, and ⁷ Li NMR MAS and PFG spectroscopy to show that increasing the Cl^- /S^2- ratio has a systematic, and remarkable impact on Li-ion diffusivity in the lattice. The phase at the limit of the solid solution regime, Li_5.5 PS_4.5 Cl_1.5 , exhibits a cold-pressed conductivity of 9.4±0.1 mS cm^-1 at 298 K (and 12.0±0.2 mS cm^-1 on sintering)-almost four-fold greater than Li₆ PS₅ Cl under identical processing conditions and comparable to metastable superionic Li₇ P₃ S₁₁ . Weakened interactions between the mobile Li-ions and surroun

	Year	Citations

References