Publication | Closed Access
Two‐hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy<sup>1</sup>
131
Citations
24
References
1998
Year
Appropriate ToolPharmacotherapyNephrologyPharmacokineticsRenal FunctionDrug MonitoringClinical ChemistryRenal PharmacologyRadiation OncologyRadiologyHealth SciencesSerum CreatinineTransplantation SurgeryTherapeutic Drug MonitoringPharmacokinetic ModelingCyclosporine Level DeterminationRenal PathophysiologyPharmacologyClinical PharmacologyAcute RejectionMedicineSafety ProfileCytopathologyAnesthesiologyQuantitative Pharmacology
To assess the safety profile of Neoral dose adjustment using cyclosporine (CSA) trough levels (C 0 ) compared with levels obtained 2 h after the morning dose (C 2 ), 30 stable adult heart transplant patients 1 yr or more after surgery were converted from Sandimmune to Neoral. After a baseline visit (before conversion), initial follow‐up included two visits (2 and 4‐6 wk after conversion). After the first visit. patients were randomized to Group I (CC 2 : 100‐200 ng/ml) or Group II (CC 2 : 200‐400 ng/ml). Abbreviated pharmacokinetics were obtained for the estimation of the AUC 0‐4h 4 h. Renal function was assessed by serum creatinine and the cimetidine‐modified creatinine clearance. C 2 correlated better than C 0 with the AUC 0‐4h (r = 0.91 vs. 0.63). Initial Neoral dose (mg/kg/d) was similar in both groups (2.8±0.5 and 2.80.8), and was lower in Group II at the second visit (2.0±0.7 vs. 3.0±0.6, p = 0.0001). C 2 levels decreased in Group II from 912±438 to 555271 ng/ml (p=0.01), without evidence of acute rejection on endomyocardial biopsies. After the second visit, both groups were monitored with C 2 , and the range was increased to 300‐600 ng/ml. At the last visit (additional follow‐up of 5±1 months), Neoral dose (mg/ kg/d) was reduced to 2.0±0.3 in Group I (p<0.001) and 1.8 ±0.4 in Group II. Serum creatinine was lower in Group II at the second visit (13859 vs. 168±37 μmol/L, p = 0.01) and was similar in both groups at the last visit. Neoral dose reduction based on C 2 levels was not associated with acute rejection. The better correlation with the AUC 0‐4h suggests that C 2 may be more reliable than C 0 for Neoral dose adjustment.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1