Cancer Medicine · 2024 · 16 citations · 31 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer ImmunologyChemotherapyImmunotherapyCancer ImmunotherapyCheckpoint Inhibitor TherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapy For Solid TumorsTargeted TherapyTherapy Response AssessmentCheckpoint Inhibitor CombinationsCheckpoint Inhibitor TrialsCombination Checkpoint TherapyImmune Checkpoint Blockade CombinationsImmune Checkpoint Combination TherapyImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor TherapyImmunotherapy TrialsOpen-label Trials
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non-inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two-three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336). RESULTS: Among the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non-inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31-8.69) and 4.40 (3.10-5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non-inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40-41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59-1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non-inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non-inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non-inosine group. CONCLUSION: Inosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy-related adverse reactions.
31
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Caroline Robert, Jacob Schachter, Georgina V. Long et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 5.8K citations · Full text
Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors
Bertrand Routy, Emmanuelle Le Chatelier, Lisa Derosa et al. · Science · 2017 · 5.4K citations
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma without <i>BRAF</i> Mutation
Caroline Robert, Georgina V. Long, Benjamin Brady et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2014 · 5.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +14
Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients
Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan, Luigi Nezi, Alexandre Reuben et al. · Science · 2017 · 4.7K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
Commensal <i>Bifidobacterium</i> promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti–PD-L1 efficacy
Ayelet Sivan, Leticia Corrales, Nathaniel Hubert et al. · Science · 2015 · 3.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Immunology, Oncology +17