<scp>C<sub>4</sub></scp> monocots and <scp>C<sub>4</sub></scp> dicots exhibit rapid photosynthetic induction response in contrast to <scp>C<sub>3</sub></scp> plants

K. TANIGAWA, Yuchen Qu, Naoya Katsuhama, Kazuma Sakoda, Yu Wakabayashi, Yu Tanaka, Rowan F. Sage, Tracy Lawson, Wataru Yamori

Physiologia Plantarum · 2024 · 13 citations · 66 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Abstract Considering the prevalence of ever‐changing conditions in the natural world, investigation of photosynthetic responses in C 4 plants under fluctuating light is needed. Here, we studied the effect of dynamic illumination on photosynthesis in totally 10 C 3 , C 3 –C 4 intermediate, C 4 ‐like and C 4 dicots and monocots at CO 2 concentrations of 400 and 800 μmol mol −1 . C 4 and C 4 ‐like plants had faster photosynthetic induction and light‐induced stomatal dynamics than C 3 plants at 400 μmol mol −1 , but not at 800 μmol mol −1 CO 2 , at which the CO 2 supply rarely limits photosynthesis. C 4 and C 4 ‐like plants had a higher water use efficiency than C 3 plants at both CO 2 concentrations. There were positive correlations between photosynthetic induction and light‐induced stomatal response, together with CO 2 compensation point, which was a parameter of the CO 2 ‐concentrating mechanism of C 4 photosynthesis. These results clearly show that C 4 photosynthesis in both monocots and dicots adapts to fluctuating light conditions more efficiently than C 3 photosynthesis. The rapid photosynthetic induction response in C 4 plants can be attributed to the rapid stomatal dynamics, the CO 2 ‐concentrating mechanism or both.

References

66