JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2024 · 10 citations · 27 references
MedicineCardiologyCardiothoracic SurgeryClinical CardiologyHemodynamic ManagementCardiac AssessmentCardiac Risk AssessmentCardiovascular AssessmentCardiovascular ImagingCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseClinical Prediction RulesClinical Risk PredictionComputed Tomography Coronary AngiographyComputed Tomography Fractional Flow ReserveCoronary Artery Calcium ScoreCoronary Ct AngiographyInvasive AngiographyInvasive Coronary Angiography
BACKGROUND: Selection for invasive angiography is recommended to be based on pretest probabilities (PTPs), and physiological measures of hemodynamical impairment by, for example, fractional flow reserve (FFR) should guide revascularization. The risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (RF-CL) and coronary artery calcium score-weighted clinical likelihood (CACS-CL) models show superior discrimination of patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but validation against hemodynamic impairment is warranted. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to validate the RF-CL and CACS-CL models against hemodynamically obstructive CAD. METHODS: Stable de novo chest pain patients (N = 4,371) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography and subsequently invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurements. Hemodynamically obstructive CAD was defined as invasive FFR ≤0.80 or high-grade stenosis by visual assessment (>90% diameter stenosis). For comparison, a guideline-endorsed basic PTP model was calculated based on age, sex, and symptom typicality. The RF-CL model additionally included the number of risk factors, and the CACS-CL model incorporated the coronary artery calcium score into the RF-CL. RESULTS: In total, 447 of 4,371 (10.9%) patients had hemodynamically obstructive CAD. Both the RF-CL and CACS-CL models classified more patients with a very low clinical likelihood (≤5%) of obstructive CAD compared to the basic PTP model (33.0% and 53.7% vs 12.0%; P < 0.001) with a preserved low prevalence of hemodynamically obstructive CAD (<5% for all models). Against hemodynamically obstructive CAD, calibration and discrimination of the RF-CL and CACS-CL models were superior to the basic PTP model. CONCLUSIONS: The RF-CL and CACS-CL models are well calibrated and superior to a currently recommended basic PTP model to predict hemodynamically obstructive CAD. (Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease [Dan-NICAD]; NCT02264717; Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 [Dan-NICAD 2]; NCT03481712, Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease 3 [Dan-NICAD 3]; NCT04707859).
27
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes
Juhani Knuuti, William Wijns, Antti Saraste et al. · European Heart Journal · 2019 · 7.1K citations · Full text
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Franz‐Josef Neumann, Miguel Sousa‐Uva, Anders Ahlsson et al. · European Heart Journal · 2018 · 7.1K citations · Full text
Low Diagnostic Yield of Elective Coronary Angiography
Manesh R. Patel, Eric D. Peterson, David Dai et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 1.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +11