EP Europace · 2024 · 51 citations · 22 references
MedicineCardiologyElectrophysiologyInterventional CardiologyAblation TherapyAtrial ElectrophysiologyAtrial FibrillationCardiac CatheterizationCatheter AblationIntracardiac ElectrophysiologyAblation SafetyAblation Site LocalizationCollateral Damage AssessmentMinimization Of Collateral DamagePulsed Field AblationPulsed Radiofrequency AblationSafety In Ablation TherapySurgical Ablation
AIMS: Superior vena cava (SVC) isolation during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is limited by the risk of collateral damage to the sinus node and/or the phrenic nerve. Due to its tissue-specificity, we hypothesized the feasibility and safety of pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-based SVC isolation. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing PFA-based AF catheter ablation were prospectively included. After pulmonary vein isolation (±posterior wall isolation and electrical cardioversion), SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow. Acute SVC isolation was achieved in 105/105 (100%) patients after 6 ± 1 applications. Transient phrenic nerve stunning occurred in 67/105 (64%) patients but without phrenic nerve palsy at the end of the procedure and at hospital discharge. Transient high-degree sinus node dysfunction occurred in 5/105 (4.7%) patients, with no recurrence at the end of the procedure and until discharge. At the 3-month follow-up visit, no complication occurred. CONCLUSION: SVC isolation using a pentaspline PFA catheter is feasible and safe.
22
Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Initiated by Non–Pulmonary Vein Ectopy
Wei‐Shiang Lin, CHING‐TAI TAI, Ming-Hsiung Hsieh et al. · Circulation · 2003 · 751 citations · Full text
Andrea Corrado, Aldo Bonso, Michela Madalosso et al. · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · 2009 · 175 citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +7