Journal of Hospital Infection · 2024 · 10 citations · 9 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyBacteriologyInfection PreventionMedical MicrobiologyBacterial BiofilmsEndoscopic InstrumentsMicrobial BiofilmsMicrobiological AnalysisPathogen RemovalSterilization TechniquesBacterial RetentionBiofilm RemovalCleaningInfection Risk FactorsMicrobial Residue ControlTotal Organic CarbonTotal Organic Carbon Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels. METHODS: ). RESULTS: The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.
9
Is bacteriologic surveillance in endoscope reprocessing stringent enough?
Julia Kovaleva, N.E.L. Meessen, Femke P. Peters et al. · Endoscopy · 2009 · 81 citations
Arjan W. Rauwers, Annet Troelstra, Ad C. Fluit et al. · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019 · 62 citations · Full text