Concepedia

To trust or not to trust: evaluating the reliability and safety of AI responses to laryngeal cancer queries

Magdalena Ostrowska, Paulina Kacała, Deborah Onolememen, Katie Vaughan-Lane, Anitta Sisily Joseph, Adam Ostrowski, Wioletta Pietruszewska, Jacek Banaszewski, Maciej Wróbel

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · 2024 · 24 citations · 21 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

LLMs can be valuable resources for patients seeking information on laryngeal cancer. ChatGPT 3.5 provided the most reliable and safe responses among the models evaluated.

References

21

Cancer statistics, 2022

Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Hannah E. Fuchs et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2022 · 17.9K citations · Full text

, , +18

Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios

Marco Cascella, Jonathan Montomoli, Valentina Bellini et al. · Journal of Medical Systems · 2023 · 1K citations · Full text

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx: EHNS–ESMO–ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

J.-P. Machiels, C. René Leemans, Wojciech Golusiński et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2020 · 788 citations · Full text

, , +8

YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?

Heidi Oi‐Yee Li, Adrian Bailey, David Huynh et al. · BMJ Global Health · 2020 · 770 citations · Full text

Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information

Skyler B. Johnson, Andy J. King, Echo L. Warner et al. · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · 2023 · 282 citations · Full text