Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2024 · 10 citations · 13 references
Life SciencesGeneticsObstetricsGenomicsMedical GeneticsPrenatal DiagnosisClinical GenomicsPregnancyPrenatal AssessmentPrenatal CarePrenatal Genetic DiagnosisPrenatal Molecular TestingDiagnostic Test YieldDiagnostic Yield AssessmentExome SequencingNext-generation Sequencing-based DiagnosisPregnancy Outcome AssessmentPrenatal Exome SequencingPrenatal GenomicsPrenatal Whole-genome Sequencing
BACKGROUND: Trio exome sequencing can be used to investigate congenital abnormalities identified on pregnancy ultrasound, but its use in an Australian context has not been assessed. AIMS: Assess clinical outcomes and changes in management after expedited genomic testing in the prenatal period to guide the development of a model for widespread implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three prospective referrals for whole exome sequencing, including 40 trios (parents and pregnancy), two singletons and one duo were assessed in a tertiary hospital setting with access to a state-wide pathology laboratory. Diagnostic yield, turn-around time (TAT), gestational age at reporting, pregnancy outcome, change in management and future pregnancy status were assessed for each family. RESULTS: A clinically significant genomic diagnosis was made in 15/43 pregnancies (35%), with an average TAT of 12 days. Gestational age at time of report ranged from 16 + 5 to 31 + 6 weeks (median 21 + 3 weeks). Molecular diagnoses included neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, RASopathies and a range of other rare Mendelian disorders. The majority of families actively used the results in pregnancy decision making as well as in management of future pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid second trimester prenatal genomic testing can be successfully delivered to investigate structural abnormalities in pregnancy, providing crucial guidance for current and future pregnancy management. The time-sensitive nature of this testing requires close laboratory and clinical collaboration to ensure appropriate referral and result communication. We found the establishment of a prenatal coordinator role and dedicated reporting team to be important facilitators. We propose this as a model for genomic testing in other prenatal services.
13
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri J. Bale et al. · Genetics in Medicine · 2015 · 32.2K citations · Full text
Chromosomal Microarray versus Karyotyping for Prenatal Diagnosis
Ronald J. Wapner, Brynn Levy, Blake C. Ballif et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Obstetrics +17