Ophthalmology Science · 2024 · 43 citations · 28 references
MedicineOphthalmologySurgeryClinical Vision ScienceOphthalmic SurgeryVisual RehabilitationAge-related Macular DegenerationMacular DegenerationMacular DiseaseMacular DisordersVisual AcuityVisual ImpairmentAcuity In Macular DiseaseAge-related Macular Degeneration Visual ImpairmentMacular Degeneration Vision LossPostoperative Visual AcuityVisual Acuity GainsVisual Acuity ImprovementVisual Function LossVisual Prosthetics
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of the PRIMA neurostimulation system with a subretinal microchip for improving visual acuity (VA) in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) at 48-months post-implantation.DesignFirst-in-human clinical trial of the PRIMA subretinal prosthesis in patients with atrophic AMD, measuring best-corrected ETDRS VA (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03333954).SubjectsFive patients with GA, no foveal light perception and VA of logMAR 1.3 to 1.7 (20/400-20/1000) in their worse-seeing “study” eye.MethodsIn patients subretinally implanted with a photovoltaic neurostimulation array containing 378 pixels of 100 μm in size, the VA was measured with and without the PRIMA system using ETDRS charts at 1 meter. The system’s external components, augmented reality glasses and pocket computer, provide image processing capabilities, including zoom.Main Outcome MeasuresVA using ETDRS charts with and without the system, as well as light sensitivity in the central visual field, measured by Octopus perimetry. Anatomical outcomes demonstrated by fundus photography and optical coherence tomography up to 48-months post-implantation.ResultsAll five subjects met the primary endpoint of light perception elicited by the implant in the scotoma area. In one patient the implant was incorrectly inserted into the choroid. One subject died 18-months post-implantation due to study-unrelated reason. ETDRS VA results for the remaining three subjects are reported herein. Without zoom, VA closely matched the pixel size of the implant: 1.17 ± 0.13 pixels, corresponding to mean logMAR 1.39, or Snellen 20/500, ranging from 20/438 to 20/565. Using zoom at 48 months, subjects improved their VA by 32 ETDRS letters versus baseline (SE 5.1) 95% CI[13.4,49.9], p<0.0001. Natural peripheral visual function in the treated eye did not decline after surgery, nor during the 48 months follow-up period (p=0.08).ConclusionsSubretinal implantation of PRIMA in subjects with GA suffering from profound vision loss due to AMD is feasible and well tolerated, with no reduction of natural peripheral vision up to 48-months. Prosthetic central vision provided by photovoltaic neurostimulation enabled patients to reliably recognize letters and sequences of letters, and with zoom it improved VA of up to eight ETDRS lines.
28
The Five-year Incidence and Progression of Age-related Maculopathy
Ronald Klein, Susan C. Jensen, Stacy M. Meuer · Ophthalmology · 1997 · 1.1K citations
Interim Results from the International Trial of Second Sight's Visual Prosthesis
Mark S. Humayun, Jessy D. Dorn, Lyndon da Cruz et al. · Ophthalmology · 2012 · 702 citations
Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery +6
Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis with high pixel density
Keith Mathieson, James Loudin, Georges Goetz et al. · Nature Photonics · 2012 · 466 citations · Full text
Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS – Clinical trial interim report
Katarína Štingl, Karl Ulrich Bartz‐Schmidt, Dorothea Besch et al. · Vision Research · 2015 · 392 citations · Full text