PLoS Biology · 2024 · 22 citations · 17 references
ManagementKnowledge ManagementKnowledge SharingScience PolicyStakeholder EngagementCollaborative Knowledge SharingCommunity CollaborationInterdisciplinary CollaborationPeer ReviewResearch Collaboration ManagementScientific ConsensusConsensusOnline Peer ReviewPeer Review ConsensusPeer Review PolicyPeer Review TransparencyPeer-to-peer ReviewPreprint EthicsPreprint Publishing
Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer review at journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As preprints become more widely used and accepted, they raise the possibility of rethinking the peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial than traditional journal peer review, and to thus fundamentally shift the culture of peer review toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call to action to stakeholders in the community to accelerate the growing momentum of preprint sharing and provide recommendations to empower researchers to provide open and constructive peer review for preprints.
17
Accelerating scientific publication in biology
Ronald D. Vale · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2015 · 213 citations · Full text
Education, Biology, Communication +16
Peer review: Troubled from the start
Alex Csiszar · Nature · 2016 · 173 citations · Full text