BMJ Open · 2024 · 10 citations · 30 references
MedicineEndocrinologyDiabetologyHealth Technology AssessmentOutcomes ResearchClinical TrialsDiabetes ControlDiabetes ManagementDiabetes MellitusGlycemic ControlGlycemic MonitoringArtificial Pancreas SystemsBolus Insulin TherapyClosed-loop Insulin DeliveryClosed-loop Insulin TherapyDiabetes Management AppsInsulin Delivery DevicesInsulin Dosing AlgorithmsInsulin Management
INTRODUCTION: Multiple automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have become commercially available following randomised controlled trials demonstrating benefits in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, their real-world utility may be undermined by user-associated burdens, including the need to carbohydrate count and deliver manual insulin boluses. There is an important need for a 'fully automated closed loop' (FCL) AID system, without manual mealtime boluses. The (Closed Loop Open SourcE In Type 1 diabetes) trial is a randomised trial comparing an FCL AID system to the same system used as a hybrid closed loop (HCL) in people with T1D, in an outpatient setting over an extended time frame. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Randomised, open-label, parallel, non-inferiority trial comparing the Android Artificial Pancreas System (AAPS) AID algorithm used as FCL to the same algorithm used as HCL. Seventy-five participants aged 18-70 will be randomised (1:1) to one of two treatment arms for 12 weeks: (a) FCL-participants will be advised not to bolus for meals and (b) HCL-participants will use the AAPS AID algorithm as HCL with announced meals. The primary outcome is the percentage of time in target sensor glucose range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L). Secondary outcomes include other glycaemic metrics, safety, psychosocial factors, platform performance and user dietary factors. Twenty FCL arm participants will participate in a 4-week extension phase comparing glycaemic and dietary outcomes using NovoRapid (insulin aspart) to Fiasp (insulin aspart and niacinamide). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approvals are by the Alfred Health Ethics Committee (615/22) (Australia) and Health and Disability Ethics Committees (2022 FULL 13832) (New Zealand). Each participant will provide written informed consent. Data protection and confidentiality will be ensured. Study results will be disseminated by publications, conferences and patient advocacy groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ACTRN12622001400752 and ACTRN12622001401741.
30
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
A.-W. Chan, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Peter C Gøtzsche et al. · BMJ · 2013 · 7.1K citations · Full text
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England
Nancy Devlin, Koonal Shah, Yan Feng et al. · Health Economics · 2017 · 1.4K citations · Full text