Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · 2024 · 25 citations · 16 references
MedicineSurgeryGeneral SurgeryMicrosurgeryReconstructive SurgeryEndoscopic InstrumentsEndoscopic SurgeryGastrointestinal EndoscopyMinimally Invasive SurgerySuturing InstrumentsTherapeutic EndoscopyClosuresEndoscopic Suturing InstrumentsLong-term Clinical SuccessMinimally Invasive Suturing DevicesMucosal Defect ClosureMulticenter TrialsReintervention RatesSurgical Endoscopy
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The application of endoscopic suturing has revolutionized defect closures. Conventional over-the-scope suturing necessitates removal of the scope, placement of the device, and reinsertion. A single channel, single sequence, through-the-scope suturing device has been developed to improve this process. This study aims to describe the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of a through-the-scope suturing device for gastrointestinal defect closure. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 9 centers of consecutive adult patients who underwent suturing using the X-Tack Endoscopic HeliX Tacking System (Apollo Endosurgery). The primary outcomes were technical success and long-term clinical success. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, recurrence, and reintervention rates. RESULTS: In all, 56 patients (mean age 53.8, 33 women) were included. Suturing indications included fistula repair (n=22), leak repair (n=7), polypectomy defect closure (n=12), peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) site closure (n=7), perforation repair (n=6), and ulcers (n=2). Patients were followed at a mean duration of 74 days. Overall technical and long-term clinical success rates were 92.9% and 75%, respectively. Both technical and clinical success rates were 100% for polypectomies, POEM-site closures, and ulcers. Success rates were lower for the repair of fistulas (95.5% technical, 54.5% clinical), leaks (57.1%, 28.6%), and perforations (100%, 66.7%). No immediate adverse events were noted. CONCLUSION: This novel, through-the-scope endoscopic suturing system, is a safe and feasible method to repair defects that are ≤3 cm. The efficacy of this device may be better suited for superficial defects as opposed to full-thickness defects. Larger defects will need more sutures and probably a double closure technique to provide a reinforcement layer.
16
A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop
Peter B. Cotton, Glenn M. Eisen, Lars Aabakken et al. · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2010 · 2.4K citations