European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2024 · 20 citations · 25 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineUrologyDiagnostic ImagingMetastasisMolecular ImagingCancer DetectionCancer StagingProstate CancerProstate Cancer ImagingProstate ImagingTumor StagingInterobserver Agreement In StagingLocal Tumor StagingProstate Cancer DiagnosisProstate-specific Membrane Antigen PetProstate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission TomographyPsma-pet ImagingRobot-assisted Radical ProstatectomyRobotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) is recognized as the most accurate imaging modality for detection of metastatic high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Its role in the local staging of disease is yet unclear. We assessed the intra- and interobserver variability, as well as the diagnostic accuracy of the PSMA PET/CT based molecular imaging local tumour stage (miT-stage) for the local tumour stage assessment in a large, multicentre cohort of patients with intermediate and high-risk primary PCa, with the radical prostatectomy specimen (pT-stage) serving as the reference standard. METHODS: A total of 600 patients who underwent staging PSMA PET/CT before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was studied. In 579 PSMA positive primary prostate tumours a comparison was made between miT-stage as assessed by four nuclear physicians and the pT-stage according to ISUP protocol. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were determined. In a representative subset of 100 patients, the intra-and interobserver variability were assessed using Kappa-estimates. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the PSMA PET/CT based miT-stage were 58% and 59% for pT3a-stage, 30% and 97% for ≥ pT3b-stage, and 68% and 61% for overall ≥ pT3-stage, respectively. No statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found between tracers. We found a substantial intra-observer agreement for PSMA PET/CT assessment of ≥ T3-stage (k 0.70) and ≥ T3b-stage (k 0.75), whereas the interobserver agreement for the assessment of ≥ T3-stage (k 0.47) and ≥ T3b-stage (k 0.41) were moderate. CONCLUSION: In a large, multicentre study evaluating 600 patients with newly diagnosed intermediate and high-risk PCa, we showed that PSMA PET/CT may have a value in local tumour staging when pathological tumour stage in the radical prostatectomy specimen was used as the reference standard. The intra-observer and interobserver variability of assessment of tumour extent on PSMA PET/CT was moderate to substantial.
25
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch · Biometrics · 1977 · 78.9K citations · Full text
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Nikita Sandeep Wagle et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2023 · 16.7K citations · Full text
Michael S. Hofman, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Roslyn J. Francis et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 2K citations
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Assessment of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Wolfgang P. Fendler, Jérémie Calais, Matthias Eiber et al. · JAMA Oncology · 2019 · 787 citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17