ACS Omega · 2024 · 17 citations · 66 references
The complex modeling accuracy of gas hydrate models has been recently improved owing to the existence of data for machine learning tools. In this review, we discuss most of the machine learning tools used in various hydrate-related areas such as phase behavior predictions, hydrate kinetics, CO<sub>2</sub> capture, and gas hydrate natural distribution and saturation. The performance comparison between machine learning and conventional gas hydrate models is also discussed in detail. This review shows that machine learning methods have improved hydrate phase property predictions and could be adopted in current and new gas hydrate simulation software for better and more accurate results.
66
Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers
Johan A. K. Suykens, Joos Vandewalle · Neural Processing Letters · 1999 · 9.3K citations · Full text
Fuzzy logic—a personal perspective
Lotfi A. Zadeh · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · 2015 · 370 citations
Randomized smoothing for stochastic optimization
John C. Duchi · 2016 · 185 citations
Salaheldin Elkatatny, Zeeshan Tariq, Mohamed Mahmoud · Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering · 2016 · 173 citations