Annals of Surgical Oncology · 2023 · 31 citations · 40 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryChemotherapyMedical OncologySurgical OncologyChemotherapy Drug AdministrationChemotherapy ResistanceCombination ChemotherapyOvarian CancerOvarian Cancer PharmacotherapyDoxorubicin-based TherapyOvarian Cancer ChemotherapyOvarian Cancer Clinical TrialsOvarian Cancer RecurrenceOvarian Cancer TreatmentOvarian Tumor RecurrenceRecurrent Platinum-resistant Ovarian CancerTherapeutic Efficacy Assessment
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in platinum-resistant recurrence of ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis, while our secondary endpoint was to establish any changes in quality of life estimated via the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-OV28 questionnaires. METHODS: via sequential laparoscopy. RESULTS: Overall, 98 PIPAC procedures were performed on 43 women from January 2016 to January 2020; three procedures were aborted due to extensive intra-abdominal adhesions. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was reached in 82% of women. Three cycles of PIPAC were completed in 18 women (45%), and 13 (32.5%) and 9 (22.5%) patients were subjected to one and two cycles, respectively. During two PIPAC procedures, patients experienced an intraoperative intestinal perforation. There were no treatment-related deaths. Nineteen patients showed no response according to the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) and 8 patients showed minor response according to the PRGS. Median time from ovarian cancer relapse to disease progression was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.483-17.517), while the median overall survival was 27 months (95% CI 20.337-33.663). The EORTC QLQ-28 and EORTC QLQ-30 scores did not worsen during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: PIPAC seems a feasible approach for the treatment of this subset of patients, without any impact on their quality of life. Since this study had a small sample size and a single-center design, future research is mandatory, such as its application in addition to systemic chemotherapy.
40
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
N.K. Aaronson, Sam H. Ahmedzai, Bengt Bergman et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1993 · 16K citations
New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors
Patrick Therasse, Susan G. Arbuck, Elizabeth A. Eisenhauer et al. · Breast Cancer · 2005 · 662 citations