Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

Beverley Shea, Barnaby C Reeves, George A. Wells et al. · BMJ · 2017 · 10.4K citations · Full text

Public Affairs, Health Policy, Evidence-based Practice +16

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley Shea, Jeremy Grimshaw, George A. Wells et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2007 · 4.4K citations · Full text

Management, Quality Management, Method Validation +13

The clinical and cost effectiveness of a Breathlessness Intervention Service for patients with advanced non-malignant disease and their informal carers: mixed findings of a mixed method randomised controlled trial

Morag Farquhar, A Toby Prevost, Paul McCrone et al. · Trials · 2016 · 136 citations · Full text

Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacoeconomics +17

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?

Uta Wegewitz, Beate Weikert, Alba Fishta et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2016 · 79 citations · Full text

Nursing, Quality Management, Evidence-based Practice +16

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting

Dawid Pieper, Nadja Koensgen, Jessica Breuing et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2018 · 77 citations · Full text

Public Health, Internal Medicine, Evidence-based Practice +14