Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2023 · 128 citations · 13 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryChemotherapyGastrointestinal OncologySurgical OncologyCytoreductive SurgeryCytotoxic ChemotherapyGastrointestinal Cancer SurgeryMetastatic Gastrointestinal CancerClinicaltrials.gov RegistrationGastric Cancer CytoreductionGastric Peritoneal MetastasesOverall MortalityPeritoneal Metastasis SurgerySurgical Cytoreduction
PURPOSE In patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC), chemotherapy is the treatment of choice. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are still being debated. This randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter phase III trial (EudraCT 2006-006088-22; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02158988 ) explored the impact on overall survival (OS) of HIPEC after CRS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients with GC and histologically proven PM were randomly assigned (1:1) to perioperative chemotherapy and CRS alone (CRS-A) or CRS plus HIPEC (CRS + H). HIPEC comprised mitomycin C 15 mg/m 2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 in 5 L of saline perfused for 60 minutes at 42°C. The primary end point was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), other distant metastasis-free survival (MFS), and safety. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS Between March 2014 and June 2018, 105 patients were randomly assigned (53 patients to CRS-A and 52 patients to CRS + H). The trial stopped prematurely because of slow recruitment. In 55 patients, treatment stopped before CRS mainly due to disease progression/death. Median OS was the same for both groups (CRS + H, 14.9 [97.2% CI, 8.7 to 17.7] months v CRS-A, 14.9 [97.2% CI, 7.0 to 19.4] months; P = .1647). The PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 7.0) in the CRS-A group and 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.5; P = .047) in the CRS + H group. The CRS + H group showed better MFS (10.2 months [95% CI, 7.7 to 14.7] v CRS-A, 9.2 months [95% CI, 6.8 to 11.5]; P = .0286). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was similar between groups (CRS-A, 38.1% v CRS + H, 43.6%; P = .79). CONCLUSION This study showed no OS difference between CRS + H and CRS-A. PFS and MFS were significantly better in the CRS + H group, which needs further exploration. HIPEC did not increase AEs.
13
Yelena Y. Janjigian, Kohei Shitara, Markus Moehler et al. · The Lancet · 2021 · 2.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +16
Salah‐Eddin Al‐Batran, Nils Homann, Claudia Pauligk et al. · The Lancet · 2019 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin for Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer
David Cunningham, Naureen Starling, Sheela Rao et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2008 · 2.3K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +12
François Quénet, Dominique Élias, Lise Roca et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2021 · 789 citations · Full text
Xiaojun Yang, Chaoqun Huang, Tao Suo et al. · Annals of Surgical Oncology · 2011 · 683 citations · Full text